Ok. I keep seeing that a ruling is “anticipated” by June 30th. Wondering what makes them so confident so as for it to be anticipated.
I googled the Calanders for the next 100 years just to confirm a suspicion of mine and found a June 30th in each one.
Thomas’s sharp dissent: Justice Thomas criticized the Court for intervening in a minor procedural issue for a convicted murderer while declining to address more significant cases involving law-abiding citizens.
the above is from some website I was reading but kind of tells us why our stuff is always last.
was this case about the way NJ lists guns on a roster as assault weapons as well as AR-15s
I really hope we don’t get a stay here.
I am completely lost at this point on these lawsuits
What are you lost on? Granted there are a lot to keep track of, but this is the consolidated AWB and mag limit case. Arguments have been heard, and we’ve been waiting on a ruling. Speculation is that they were waiting on decisions so any precedent in them could be included in their ruling. They are currently extending that opportunity to counsel now with a limited time frame to do it. Our side will get to say I told you so. Their side might want to alter some of their arguments based on BS lower court shenanigans that did not abide by SCOTUS precedent and just got reprimanded in the recent rulings. Neither Wolford or Hemani is related in detail to this case, but significant things were said about how the 2a is applied and how certain approaches by lower courts are NOT how they said they need to execute their standard of analysis.
1 Like
Mark Smith just explained it pretty good, he thinks December
He did not. He said that it is likely SCOTUS oral arguments will happen in December. He said he thinks platkin will be “within the next month” which when he posted it would be by early August.
Supplemental briefs filed:
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF on behalf of Appellees Ass’n of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs Inc., Blake Ellman, Thomas R. Rogers and Marc Weinberg in 24-2415, 24-2450, Appellants Ass’n of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs Inc., Blake Ellman, Thomas R. Rogers and Marc Weinberg in 24-2506. Certificate of Service dated 07/10/2026 by ECF. [24-2415, 24-2450, 24-2506] (EEM)
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF on behalf of Appellants Mark Cheeseman, Timothy Connelly and Firearms Policy Coalition Inc in 24-2415, Appellees Mark Cheeseman, Timothy Connelly and Firearms Policy Coalition Inc in 24-2450, 24-2506. Certificate of Service dated 07/10/2026 by ECF. [24-2415, 24-2450, 24-2506] (DHT)
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF on behalf of Appellees Attorney General New Jersey, Bradley D. Billhimer, Christine A. Hoffman and Superintendent New Jersey State Police in 24-2415, 24-2506, Appellants Attorney General New Jersey, Bradley D. Billhimer, Christine A. Hoffman and Superintendent New Jersey State Police in 24-2450. Certificate of Service dated 07/10/2026 by ECF. [24-2415, 24-2506, 24-2450] (JF)
1 Like
And in the brief, AG Davenport keeps referring to “unusually dangerous”
That’s what the state thinks WE are!
Fuggem big time.
Then ‘Platner’ them just to show them who’s in charge!
1 Like
1 Like
certainly reads as a win. I’m not sure what the remand implies though.
1 Like
Looking forward to having an actual legal mind read the entire opinion and tell us what it practically means for us.
1 Like
3rd Circuit finds NJs AWB UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!
Great win for you guys!
2 Likes
Is it drill bit time now?
3 Likes