The House has voted, very narrowly, to remove suppressors from NFA regulations. Still needs to pass the Senate:
If it passes the Senate it won’t have any immediate effect for us in NJ as suppressors are outlawed for us at the state level but still an interesting development.
We will never see them in NJ, at least not for a long time. With muzzle devices welded and pinned, no way to attach them. Unless, maybe there are brakes that are also attachment systems that will be compatible.
There are a few attachment systems that allow that. Griffin makes one that attaches to an A2 FH (possibly will work with an A2 style brake if it’s within tolerance).
Let’s concentrate on one thing at a time and get suppressors off the NFA list!
Also said that about CCW…
Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, are the 2 who voted against…
I wonder how much money they got from Silencer Central lobbyists
Massie votes at a “high level” outlook. I’d believe he voted out of a position that the entire NFA needs to be repealed rather than being bought out by any special interest.
When is the Senate vote?
One senator pontificated that the bill would turn the USA into a nation of assassins… Ummm… Trump… That Insurance dude… the Israeli diplomats yesterday…
If anyone knows assassins, it is the left. Pretty sure it was leftists that snuffed JFK.
The problem with democrats is they think guns are only good for one thing, killing enemies. That’s why they are so desperate to be the only ones in possession of guns.
FPM, and the horse he rode in on as well.
Cope harder
The same 2 reps who voted against Trump’s big beautiful bill! RINOs than need to be primaried! 
The hpa was part of the bbb. Thats why its the same people.
The band wagon that needs to be jumped on now is no state that keeps suppressors illegal will receive the SALT deduction. In order for the tax payers of a state to receive the increased SALT deduction that state must remove all restrictions on hearing protection devices. If the restrictions are not removed their taxpayers only get the $10K deduction.
This was done administratively to force states to raise the drinking age to 21 so there is major precedent.
Murphy would probably find not raising the SALT deduction an acceptable trade off to “keep NJ safe” from all the assassins that will surely pop up if suppressors were 50 state legalized 
. It needs to be tied to funding the state cannot function without, funding that has some tie to the issue this is addressing. I would suggest, since this bill is designed to protect hearing, cutting off all federal medical funding to the state unless suppressors are legalized.
Apparently the current version of this bill will probably make suppressors illegal in some states where they are legal now. Michigan bans all suppressors (as well as SBRs and full auto) unless the owner has gotten a tax stamp for it. So hopefully the Senate fixes this issue by making them 50 state legal.
If congress passes a law (leosa) and it is properly worded, how can a anti american state not comply. Nj tried to fight leosa and lost.
Copyright © 2024-2025. All rights reserved. New Jersey Gun Forums LLC
