Gun Owners Take DC Magazine Restrictions To Supreme Court

Let’s hope the SCOTUS does the right thing THIS time.

Gun owners in the nation’s capital are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the District of Columbia’s ban on magazines with more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

The petition in Hanson v. District of Columbia was docketed, or officially accepted for filing, by the court on Feb. 28. The respondent, the District of Columbia, was directed to file a response by March 31.

The district enacted the Firearms Registration Amendment Act of 2008 after the Supreme Court invalidated the city’s sweeping restrictions on gun ownership in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). In Heller, the nation’s highest court determined that individuals have a right to possess firearms for lawful purposes, including self-defense at home.

In Heller, Walker said, the Supreme Court determined “that the government cannot categorically ban an arm in common use for lawful purposes.”

“Magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition are arms in common use for lawful purposes. Therefore, the government cannot ban them,” Walker wrote.

In for the disappointment?

Is this in addition to the mag ban case that scotus has been eternally pushing off?

Yep, Ocean State Tactical is the “high cap” mag ban case that is currently in a prolonged holding pattern at SCOTUS.

Great that there another new mag case but Ocean State Tactical is the one to watch currently.

Yep… just another day in Paradise!

Out of all the infringements on my 2A rights in this State and Nationwide, magazine capacity limits is my number 1 issue by far. This needs to be settled at SCOTUS once and for all.

2 Likes

Ocean state is an interlocutory request, not a decided case. Hanson has the benefit of being a decided case.