U.S. v. Hemani - A Very Uncomfortable Position for the Antis

Looks like time for a change to Question #f on the 4473:

Yuppers! Probably they’ll re-word it to say something like “addicted to marijuana” while removing the “unlawful user”.

Hawaii must be REAL TIRED of dealing with Alan Beck. I think he’s now 5 for 5 in previous firearms cases with them.

I wonder how the court would have ruled if the drug was heroin or meth. oxycontin. I doubt the outcome would have been the same. Meaning, scotus does not view cannabis as something that should be prohibited or out of reach for the common person. This is going to affect other laws in ways we can’t predict.

The ATF is in the process of revising the 4473 form now. Supposedly they are going to make it simpler and less confusing. I would also expect the “non binary” option to go away. They probably were also waiting to see what came out of this ruling