CMP does not have any M1 carbines and when they get them they auction them on gun broker. anyone have another source.
I will have a few available when I’m allowed to sell them
If you need vintage well you know the deal. BUt auto ordnance makes them still last I checked. Cheap they aint.
Buds gun shop.
I hear they have stuff in their physical stores that doesn’t get put into the online auctions. Closest one is Port Huron Ohio on Camp Perry. May take a trip there one day since it’s driveable from Cleveland. They’ll also process the purchase there and ship to your place if you buy from the store.
That’s actually the opposite of what the court does (usually). They try to narrow the ruling only to the facts presented to them. That’s not a liberal or conservative thing it’s just what they do and the reason why these things seem to go on forever.
Did he mention anything on the podcast in terms of what he thinks will happen with the shotgun and pistol part of this once it’s sent back down to the district Court?
When did the courts say that they should not or could not use a permiting system? They already have a blueprint with handguns. I’m unaware if there is any current litigation challenging NJ’s permit to purchase process but it doesn’t seem like there is an appetite in the courts to take on the issue right now.
So the State Police are making policy? Doesn’t this violate the Supreme Courts Chevron Deference ruling?
Actually, the whole entire administrative code of NJ should be challenged under the new ruling.
The AGs office (and by extension the NJSP) can create policy for NJ law enforcement to follow since the AG is the Chief LE authority in the state. What they are essentially saying to these dealers is, “This is our interpretation of the law and if you don’t follow these guidelines, we will charge you with a crime.” In theory, a dealer could say F you I’m going to follow my own interpretation. They could even be charged criminally and ultimately win in court because, like you said, the courts don’t have to agree with the AGs interpretation. But most dealers don’t want to deal with the headache and legal fees so they just fall in line. Technically the whole “feature test” is just the AG’s charging guidelines to law enforcement on how to interpret “substantially identical.”
I’m still intensely curious about this NJSP communication with FFL’s.
Did NJSP decide to do this unilaterally? I’m doubtful they would have sent that without consultation with NJOAG.
If they did send that on direction from NJOAG does that then mean that NJ is not going to either seek a stay or appeal to SCOTUS?
Why set the date at 07/31? Is there a “back channel” with 3rd Circuit to know that’s the date in the mandate?
was there a date set for implementing Bruin or Heller or did the laws get struck down as soon as the gavel fell?
Per Grok:
Heller - Decision 06/26/2008, Mandate 07/28/2008
McDonald - Decision 06/28/2010, Mandate “Late July” 2010
I was a little bored this morning so I asked google a simple question. Again, this is google AI so take it with a rather large grain of salt.
100% there is communication going on between the AGs office and the NJSP Firearms Unit. But I wouldn’t read too much into the July 31 thing. The DAG that communicated that information to them could have given them an approximate date in case a stay isn’t granted. NJSP isn’t going to say anything about the stay because it would give away the AGs strategy.
If NJOAG is going for a stay then why have NJSP say anything about changes on 07/31? That’s what I don’t get.
If the stay is granted then they have to retract the statement. The statement as it stands gets everyone excited, and possibly acting, on the judgement on 07/31. There are already NJ FFL’s planning changes for 07/31.
They said they are preparing guidance, which is intentionally vague imo. The guidance could end up being “a stay has been granted so keep doing what you’ve been doing until further notice.” The NJSP Firearms Unit gives zero shits who they are inconveniencing.
I get that they’re being vague about guidance, but the “decision…is effective 07/31” is plainly stated.
If a stay is granted, then the decision doesn’t go into effect on 07/31.
Not sure anyone has the answer, but it is puzzling.
It very well could be that theyve already been told unofficially by the 3rd circuit that they won’t be granting a stay. All I’m saying is that, to me, the wording of that email doesn’t necessarily convince me that there won’t be a stay, if that makes sense.
You should bookmark this page https://www.anjrpc.org/page/Litigation_Tracker